Workplace Investigations

Contributing Editors


Workplace investigations are growing in number, size and complexity. Employers are under greater scrutiny as of the importance of ESG rises. Regulated industries such as finance, healthcare and legal face additional hurdles, but public scrutiny of businesses and how they treat their people across the board has never been higher. Conducting a fair and thorough workplace investigation is therefore critical to the optimal operation, governance and legal exposure of every business.

IEL’s Guide to Workplace Investigations examines key issues that organisations need to consider as they initiate, conduct and conclude investigations in 29 major jurisdictions around the world.  

Learn more about the response taken in specific countries or build your own report to compare approaches taken around the world.

Choose countries

 

Choose questions

Choose the questions you would like answering, or choose all for the full picture.

16. If there is a works council or trade union, does it have any right to be informed or involved in the investigation?

16. If there is a works council or trade union, does it have any right to be informed or involved in the investigation?

Flag / Icon
Finland

Finland

  • at Roschier
  • at Roschier

A works council or a trade union does not have a role in the investigation.

Last updated on 15/09/2022

Flag / Icon

South Korea

  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang

While a labour union does not have a legal right under Korean law to be informed or involved in the investigation, unless otherwise required under the relevant collective bargaining agreement, there have been instances where the labour union raised complaints that the company did not properly investigate an employee, who is a member of the labour union, particularly if the company took disciplinary action against that employee based on the findings of the investigation. The company should consider such a practical risk when conducting a workplace investigation.

If the investigation was conducted based on a claim filed by an employee to the Grievance Handling Committee (which is a sub-committee of a works council), the members of that committee have a right to be informed of the results of the investigation.

Last updated on 15/09/2022

24. What next steps are available to the employer?

24. What next steps are available to the employer?

Flag / Icon
Finland

Finland

  • at Roschier
  • at Roschier

The employer decides whether misconduct has taken place or not. Depending on the case, the employer may recommend a workplace conciliation in which the parties try to find a solution that can be accepted by both sides. The employer may choose to give an oral reprimand or a written warning. If the legal conditions are met, the employer may also terminate the employment agreement.

Last updated on 15/09/2022

Flag / Icon

South Korea

  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang
  • at Kim & Chang

After completing an investigation, the company may consider the following measures, among others:

  1. taking disciplinary action against the relevant employees;
  2. taking legal action (eg, criminal action, civil action) against the relevant employees; and
  3. taking appropriate remedial measures (eg, strengthening existing policies and establishing new policies, and conducting training).

The company may also consider making a voluntary report to the relevant authorities as discussed in question 25.

Last updated on 15/09/2022