Workplace Investigations

Contributing Editors


Workplace investigations are growing in number, size and complexity. Employers are under greater scrutiny as of the importance of ESG rises. Regulated industries such as finance, healthcare and legal face additional hurdles, but public scrutiny of businesses and how they treat their people across the board has never been higher. Conducting a fair and thorough workplace investigation is therefore critical to the optimal operation, governance and legal exposure of every business.

IEL’s Guide to Workplace Investigations examines key issues that organisations need to consider as they initiate, conduct and conclude investigations in 29 major jurisdictions around the world.  

Learn more about the response taken in specific countries or build your own report to compare approaches taken around the world.

Choose countries

 

Choose questions

Choose the questions you would like answering, or choose all for the full picture.

24. What next steps are available to the employer?

24. What next steps are available to the employer?

Flag / Icon

Germany

  • at Hengeler Mueller
  • at Hengeler Mueller
  • at Hengeler Mueller

Depending on the results of the investigation, different steps may have to be taken by the employer. Specifically, the following should be considered:

  • in certain cases, there may be an obligation (or at least good reason) to share the results of the workplace investigation with the authorities (see question 25);
  • filing of a criminal complaint against the employee;
  • disciplinary measures against the employee such as a warning, ordinary termination or termination for cause;
  • assessing and asserting claims for damages against the employee;
  • offering compliance training to the relevant employees or introducing additional measures to prevent further violations;
  • if there is a risk that the company itself is exposed to investigative proceedings at some point and may have to defend itself, investigation materials should be stored at the company's external attorney's office; and
  • depending on the individual circumstances of the case and to mitigate potential reputational damage, proactively informing the public (eg, by issuing a press release) may be beneficial.
Last updated on 15/09/2022

Flag / Icon

Portugal

  • at Uría Menéndez - Proença de Carvalho

Once the preliminary investigation ends, the employer must decide whether or not, in its view, there are grounds to bring an accusation against the employee and enforce disciplinary action or if it should be dismissed due to a lack of evidence.

When the employer decides to enforce disciplinary action, the following sanctions may be applied:

  • verbal warning;
  • written warning;
  • financial penalty;
  • loss of holiday;
  • suspension with loss of pay and length of service;
  • dismissal with cause and without compensation.

The first five penalties are usually called conservatory sanctions, enabling the continuity of the employment relationship, as opposed to dismissal, which is deemed a measure of last resort.

Last updated on 15/09/2022

Flag / Icon

Switzerland

  • at Bär & Karrer
  • at Bär & Karrer

If the investigation uncovers misconduct, the question arises as to what steps should be taken. Of course, the severity of the misconduct and the damage caused play a significant role. Furthermore, it must be noted that the cooperation of the employee concerned may be of decisive importance for the outcome of the investigation. The possibilities are numerous, ranging, for example, from preventive measures to criminal complaints.[1]

If individual disciplinary actions are necessary, these may range from warnings to ordinary or immediate termination of employment.

 

[1] David Rosenthal et al., Praxishandbuch für interne Untersuchungen und eDiscovery, Release 1.01, Zürich/Bern 2021, p. 180 et seq.

Last updated on 15/09/2022